[DRC] Lower vault spread parameter from 100 bps to 30 bps

[Govmos]

We are supporting the reduced parameter that better aligns with liquidity providers standards in the digital ecosystem.

@max-holloway

Furthermore, it is better to bias in favor of a lower spread parameter rather than a high spread parameter when testing vaults. This is because a lower spread parameter is expected to lead to more fills, which would give us more data to understand how vaults perform. In the case where I am wrong, and that 30bps is too low, we can always adjust the parameter back up to 100 bps with another governance proposal.

We look forward to keeping the community informed in the coming months. We kindly request that you conduct a study after adjusting the parameters, using the data you’ve collected, and present your findings to the community. This assessment would provide valuable insights into the impact on the protocol.

Thank you for reading,
Govmos.