At Tané, we support this proposal and have voted YES on it.
We are fully aware of the situation where the top 2 validators have more than 33% VPs and not sufficient number of tokens are staked to the validators yet. We simply value the importance of introducing the flywheel of the trading and the real staking rewards to stakers sooner rather than later over multiple risks we have at the moment.
Regarding the risks, we consider it important to evaluate them not just based on the technical feasibility but financially justifiable. At this stage, the players who may be able to halt or control the network don’t have clear financial justifications, but rather serious reputation risks.
In an ideal world, we would have been prepared more for this more or less predictable situation but we don’t believe the solution provided by @validator_net at another post should be a short term solution to work on but more for a mid-long term solution to be considered along with other solutions to diversify the staking distributions.
We hope all the bridged tokens that can be staked will be reasonably distributed into a set of validators that will have great impact on the protocol going forward.