yeah jason I hear you, I guess what this other guy is saying is they wanted to auto compound it in the treasury account (which is routinely looted with little to no oversight or accountability for the success of projects) … I think there is room for DYDX holders to collect some money on fees, most notably takers should be paying a premium and most definitely not be reimbursed anything in the slightest. and substantial fees should be placed on margin, my 8% robinhood comp is only for 2% margin… if you have a 5k account and are routinely taking position of 50 grand. I mean you must ( and the trader will) pay a premium fee for borrowing that capital. NO ONE ELSE ON THE PLANET (save another crypto type exchange) will let you borrow capital to trade aggressively like that so it must be compensated…
WHAT IS CLEAR, is that the dilution is major and for the DYDX token to not be able to sustain a real run here as ETH BTC SOL come back to basically ATHs, think shows that the treasury of tokens in its various forms are being mismanaged and simply dumped on the market place. DYDX has a solid product and yes a cash flow can be found for it. but it is very difficult when there is so much constant overhead selling which is seen crystal clear in the price this cycle last few months. DYDX UNABLE TO SUSTAIN A MOVE HIGHER, and once BTC ETH SOL the macro comes in SLIGHTLY, the token moves quickly back to lows.
This is clearly a result of the overhead dilution.
IMO, they need to stop any rewards on TAKER fees immediately (and begin to accrue fees from these types of trades)
up the fees for heavy margin to something a little more substantial given the risk to the system for loaning the margin…
(question would be what do you think someone with a 5K account in fees should pay on a 50K ETH short he holds for 2 hours, 10$ ? 30$ ? , should he pay more if the trade wins? say 1%-3% of gains on a winning trade? etc etc)
Also I think someone should keep an eye on the ratio of “money looted from the community treasury” / user (traders) growth at DYDX.
For all of this money and dilution are we sure we are getting a run of traders? should DYDX be running twitter ads in all eligible country tareting crypto users. It is very easy to sign up for an account, and the margins available are fantastic. I am not sure what the actual numbers are
but say if DYDX comm Tx has spent lets say 5M in the last 6months on various projects, and only got 1,000 new traders on the platform. That is a “user acquisition cost” of like $5,000 a trader. so IMO
someone should be monitoring closely that "user acquisition cost " number and the treasury people should be held accountable for success and failures there. As of now the treasury is mainly providing jobs and money for the people that work in and with the treasury. but its not growing markets, fees, or users well. and that is clear from the token price and the data.
The treasury doesn’t mind selling 10MM tokens at 50cents. they dont care what the price its they seem to always have another half crocked idea they need another million for.