@staza analyzed the three revenue share models with data and numbers , coming to the conclusion that model 3 (95% for stakers and 5% for treasury) provides the best results: 80% of fees to buybacks for 3 months - #64 by staza
Also he already submitted a proposal for a trial period with 80% buybacks why are you now submitting a redundant and same proposal? Nethermind a year ago presented four proposals for dYdX, yet Nethermind didn’t even take the time to study how dYdX works, in their report they thought that dYdX staking rewards come from inflation of the token rather than trading fee revenue: Analysis and Proposals on dYdX Chain and DYDX Tokenomics - #3 by Cosmic_Validator All the proposals that Nethermind presented last year were a failure. Megavault was a failure, another proposal a failure before even going to voting so it wasn’t voted, the trading volume didn’t increase and closing the bridge was also a failure leading to all the recent drama regarding the bridge closure