Gauntlet | dYdX MegaVault Update: 1-Month Insights September 2025

Summary

Gauntlet provides monthly updates notifying the dYdX community about:

  1. Newly listed markets supported by MegaVault
  2. Markets no longer supported by MegaVault along with insight into the operator’s decision to stop supporting these markets.
  3. MegaVault performance from a risk, return, and liquidity providing perspective

The aim is to provide transparency into MegaVault performance and operator decision-making. Please also refer to the Gauntlet dashboard for additional stats and information.

Market Status

Over the course of September, MegaVault has onboarded 10 new markets (listed below) and now supports 180 markets in total. These markets were added through the Instant Market Listings feature.

  • 2Z
  • ASTER
  • AVNT
  • HOLO
  • IOTA
  • LINEA
  • PROMPT
  • SKY
  • WLFI
  • XPL

MegaVault closed the following 3 subvaults during this period

  • GOONER
  • SATS
  • TSLAX

GOONER was identified as a honeypot scam. SATS and TSLAX were identified as at risk of oracle attacks due to thin liquidity on oracle price constituent centralized exchanges.

Performance Analysis

Metric Current MoM Change
30d APR -12.21% - 33.26%
30d Trailing Average % of Total Maker Volume 4.68% 2.88%
30d Trading Volume $325.74 mm +$96.13 mm
TVL $14.64 mm -$17.64 mm

MegaVault performance suffered in September realizing a 30 day APR of -12.21%. This is due to a drawdown spanning from Aug 27th to Sept 24th of -1.34%. This period saw heightened volatility especially in tail markets. Below are some examples of drawdown attribution at the market level:

  • WLD from $0.90 on 09/06 to $2.03 on 09/09, a 126% return in that period
  • LA round-tripped from $0.38 to $0.49 and back on 09/18 with similar behavior on 09/24
  • ATH from $0.30 to $0.489 on 09/08
  • SIGN from $0.08 to $0.12 before falling back to $0.08 on 09/25

In periods of volatility it is typical to see market makers widening spreads thus leading to the MegaVault absorbing a larger percentage of total market maker volume. We can observe this in the % of total maker volume chart. % of total maker volume captured was up 2.88% from last month, and MegaVault trading volume increased month over month from $229.61mm to $325.74 mm.

Supporting Data

MegaVault % of total maker volume (for markets which MegaVault is quoting)

Biggest losers:

Market Cumulative PnL ($) Cumulative Return (%)
WLD -72210 -24.04
LA -56718 -34.04
ATH -42990 -14.69
SIGN -41232 -38.46
B3 -39014 -18.54

Biggest winners:

Market Cumulative PnL ($) Cumulative Return (%)
WLFI 9442 2.03
ASTER 8090 3.41
TRX 7988 1.82
PENGU 7385 3.87
TIA 7124 2.82

can you explain why HLP vault is up +178% this month

while MegaVault is down over –20.00%

If you had to explain it in one sentence, why is HLP performing so differently compared to MegaVault

and why is MegaVault making a loss of $56,377 on a token with zero volume, zero trades and zero open interest

image

or a loss of $33,276 on a token with $1.2k volume, one trade and zero open interest

image

and many other low/no-activity tokens that are somehow incurring losses in the tens of thousands

5 Likes

Please see our 10-10 post-mortem report here.

Blockquote
can you explain why HLP vault is up +178% this month

HLP is composed of four off-chain subvault strategies. The primary source of their performance on 10-10 is their liquidator strategy subvaults which benefits from liquidations on the venue.

Blockquote
why is MegaVault making a loss of $56,377 on a token with zero volume, zero trades and zero open interest

The screenshots you cited are comparing 30d p&l against 24h volume/trades/open interest. The MegaVault operator has mandates to provide liquidity to tail markets which tend to experience spikey one-sided flow i.e. sometimes there will be a lot of volume and trading, and sometimes there is none.