MsgSendFromModuleToAccount 313,042.39 $DYDX from the community treasury at dydx15ztc7xy42tn2ukkc0qjthkucw9ac63pgp70urn to the grants multisig at dydx1a5m88d8ac29rt4jtxadjlx23l7rwlj6sgpezyd
MsgSendFromModuleToAccount 65,730.00 $DYDX from the community treasury at dydx15ztc7xy42tn2ukkc0qjthkucw9ac63pgp70urn to our operational multisig at dydx1tr3cec66rrr9jkctz3qcmzawpk6ktj6jck8ds4
The grants multisig has a three of five signer requirement and is managed by:
We (Crypto Learning Club) are in favor of actively supporting the development of mechanisms that assist teams and users who contribute to the dYdX ecosystem.
We believe this is the proper use of the treasury pool as a DAO.
This proposal is sadly not going to make it.
To many oppossing validators (with no to little justification of the vote sadly, so quite hard to understand why).
Well, you had the founder chime in and say he doesn’t like it so that basically put a nail in the coffin right there. He’s in love with how Reverie runs things, so yeah, good luck with anything competing against them.
Since this didn’t pass with almost unanimous no votes, we want to thank the council members @dan-kintsugi, @LeonoorsCryptoman, and @RealVovochka for sharing this journey with us.
StableLab is currently re-evaluating it’s approach to the dYdX ecosystem,
We fully believe in the future and prospects of this protocol, but we currently experience an unusually high amount of inbound demand for our services.
Given that many of those are paid opportunities we will have to evaluate our priorities and commitments carefully and will update the dYdX community as soon as we have made a decision on how to proceed.
Many many thanks for spearheading this initiative!
It was fun to be part of this journey leading to the proposal and who knows what the future will bring!